Rovers have limited time on Mars, so to optimize the science returns, geologists on Earth are devising new strategies for NASA’s rover drivers to find the ripest areas of study.

The Curiosity rover at a sandstone target nicknamed “Windjana” (NASA/JPL-Caltech/MSSS)

Martian rovers have the incredible advantage of exploring another planet, but the incredible disadvantage of being limited by time.

A typical geology expedition on Earth would have a team doing an overall survey of an area before deciding on a specific area of study. On Mars, however, while scientists do their best ahead of time to study orbital observations of a rover’s study area, for the most part, rovers travel from spot to spot (that look interesting from a distance) without the luxury of having a team to survey the area ahead of time.

It should be emphasized that the NASA’s Mars Exploration Rovers Spirit and Opportunity, and the Mars Science Laboratory Curiosity have returned an incredible amount of science this way. Also, the general concept of the research area does become clear as the rover drives further. However, when it comes to looking for a specific features such as biosignatures — one of the stated goals of NASA’s Mars 2020 rover — it’s possible that an extra tour around the site could make searching for the signatures more efficient.

So, geologists recently published a study in the journal Acta Astronautica discussing what could be achieved if the rovers did a survey, or overview, before carrying out focused science operations.

The Opportunity rover has been making tracks and science history on the Red Planet for more than 13 years (NASA/JPL-Caltech)

As a veteran of the NASA rover teams, Aileen Yingst said the overview method has only been done a handful of times, such as when Curiosity explored Pahrump Hills in 2014. The Opportunity rover, which as been exploring Mars since 2004, has also done it once.

RELATED ARTICLE:   NASA’s Cassini probe has broken apart in Saturn’s atmosphere — ending its 20-year journey 14

“The idea is that we want to get the most bang for our buck,” Yingst, a senior scientist at the Planetary Science Institute, told Seeker. “When we are on Mars and we have expensive and very complex, important resources that are doing our geology work, we want to make sure as scientists we are making the best decisions.”

The study took place near a unit of sedimentary rock south of Green River, Utah. (Green River is roughly three hours southeast of Salt Lake City.) Two human “rovers” were commanded to do observations of the unit, just following the instructions sent from a simulated mission control.

They moved ahead a few feet at time, just as a rover would when commanded remotely. One rover did an overview walk first and then returned to do science, while the other went from target to target. In this initial test, what the team found is that the walkabout provides context, and allows the team to pass by sites that initially looked interesting in orbital pictures, but proved not to look so unique up close. For example, a clay signature seen from orbit could just be stuff weathered off the top of rocks, Yingst said.

“That means that you know going in the second time around how important or not a site might be, because you have the whole picture in your head,” she said. The research found that when looking at an area where many close sites are candidates for in-depth studies, the walkabout method likely saves time and increases science return.

Yingst has another paper in the works that explores what happens if three competing teams go to the same site — a walkabout team, a target to target team, and a team of geologists surveying the site using traditional geological methods. The results are still being analyzed, but are expected to be released later this year.